.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

The Renewal Bible Study

Dedicated to informing and challenging Christians for the renewing of their mind.

Name:
Location: United States

Friday, April 14, 2006

From The Desk Of Pastor Paul Viggiano: Resurrection Sunday Edition


Sacrifice and a reason to rejoice

Churches will be full Sunday as congregants share the Good News of the Bible.
By Paul Viggiano

It was a haunting event in Egypt those many years ago when the angel of destruction brought death to all the firstborn, both of man and beast. Of course, it was not all the firstborn. There was a way of escape; the application of the blood of the Passover lamb upon the door posts and lintel of the house. When the Lord saw the blood, he would pass over them. The Passover would ever be celebrated by God's people.

The blood of the Passover was not the first blood ever shed in a sacrificial manner. Sacrifices go back to the beginning. Directly following the fall of man, Adam became aware of his own nakedness and was, for the first time, ashamed. He sought to hide his own shame by tying together garments of fig leaves. It was a feeble attempt. Men have been making feeble attempts ever since. There simply aren't enough fig leaves on Earth to hide our guilt before the searching eyes of a holy God.

But God is gracious as well as holy. He did not leave Adam in his shame but covered him with tunics of skin. Animals had to be sacrificed in order for these tunics to be made. They were God's animals and they were sacrificed by God. From that point until the time of Christ, animals would be sacrificed (mainly by priests) as a sign of God's promise (covenant) to cover man's shame; this would include the Passover.

Fifteen hundred years would come and go from the time the Hebrews were delivered from the slavery of Egypt. In the wilderness of Judea, a Hebrew prophet named John was baptizing those who had remained faithful to that covenant promise made by God. Seeing Jesus coming toward him, John proclaimed, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world."

The faithful Israelite recognized that the Passover lamb served merely to foreshadow the true Lamb of God. It would be the height of missing the point to think that the shedding of an animal's blood could somehow deliver men from judgment and death. The slaughtering of every animal on the Serengeti in springtime would provide no appeasement -- not a wink of approval from the Creator/Judge. Shedding the blood of the lamb during the Passover was an act of faith in what the lamb represented.

It was faith that God had made a promise to wipe clean the slate of sin and shame in which men found themselves. We might seek to convince others we have no sin; we may seek to redefine sin and call it a disorder; we may seek to rationalize our sin and justify it because of our unfortunate past or dysfunctional household -- mere fig leaves.

The Passover lamb did not represent men's efforts to justify, or even overcome, their own sin; the Passover lamb pointed to Christ. It was his blood that would be shed. The cross of Christ would satisfy the justice of a holy God and bring everlasting life to those who trust, not in themselves but in Christ alone. This is why the Apostle Paul called Christ our Passover.

It was during the Passover that Jesus would be betrayed, handed over to sinful men, go through a kangaroo court and then be sacrificed. Today we call it Easter, but the Greek word is Pascha, which means Passover.

The shame, the guilt and the condemnation that men deserved would fall upon the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ, the true Passover. But Jesus, unlike all the priests and lambs who preceded him, would rise again in a display of power and success over men's greatest enemies, death and judgment.

Churches will be at maximum capacity this Sunday. What is the message? That Jesus, the Lamb of God was sacrificed on the cross of Calvary. That the wrath and condemnation that men deserved was poured out upon the Lamb. That the Lamb of God rose victorious and grants his victory to all who call upon his name in sincere faith. This is what the Bible calls the Good News.

Could there be a happier Easter?

8 Comments:

Blogger Tom said...

I find the Passover story particularly comforting in that the angel of death didn't go inside and make sure everyone was up to code. It saw the blood and moved on. It's nice to see so many churches performing an observance of Passover, as it is such a fitting reminder of the God's great mercy.

People seem to know this message but forget it. (is that a contradiction?) People seem to be remarkably refreshed by the reminder of the unmerited grace of God.

Shalom amd Happy Easter!
Tom

6:19 PM  
Blogger Soli Deo Gloria said...

I've sat through many tellings of the gospel message which are characterized more by "changed lives" & "shining faces" than by Christ's sacrifice & vicarious atonement.

In what can only be described as a results-oriented, seeker-sensitive mentality that permeates in American churches, it is not surprising that the message of the Gospel would play second fiddle. I'm all for testimony and repentant people, but I want to hear more about my Lord and Savior more than I do about my Christian brothers and sisters.

12:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was wondering when someone was going to pick that up. Calvin was an advocate of elder visitation. Of course, some of his visits would end in the execution of the visitee.

8:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you guys executed anyone yet?

8:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Servetus affair is interesting. I was looking for a paper I had read online by Beza on the affair, who as you know was a friend of Calvin's. The papers general thesis is that Calvin was a great man but that his treatment of Servetus was surprisingly vindictive. It also sites a much quoted letter that Calvin wrote which states that if Servetus ever comes to Geneva he will see to it that he never leaves alive.

10:36 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Was Geneva a Calvinistic theonomy or was Calvin just a private citizen with no real power? Are you saying that we must fully support every action that occured in Geneva or we don't believe that the Bible is the standard of law? Truly, 'when freedom destroys order, the desire for order will destroy freedom' but are we to assume the remedial measures taken in Geneva which may have been overly harsh should be emulated in all societies? The Bible teaches a general practice of order but it doesn't teach a 9:00 curfew. Didn't Calvin enact a code of moral behavior that would have pretty much ruined most of our weekends? Didn't that code forbid things that are not expressly forbidden in scripture?

8:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I understand your postition with regard to theonomy. I am familiar with Dr. Rushdoony's works and, not to place a value on them or to discredit them, they are, you must admit, extreme.

Again, I believe the Bible is the only proper standard for law. I am a little ambiguous as to what that means. To continue using our example, I think good people can disagree on an appropriate time for a curfew or even whether there should be a curfew. Consider the variety of Sabbath obsevance beliefs in our own church. I believe our own little denomination is suspiscious of theonomy. They seem to be more about Westminster than Geneva.

I think we should pray (to use another familiar and frequently misused citation requiring contextualization) 'thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven'. I also believe that that is something that will actually happen.

11:43 AM  
Blogger Soli Deo Gloria said...

Ehud, clarify something for me here. You say:

Do I believe a 9:oo curfew appropriate? No- generally speaking, but under certain circumstances, it wouldn't be out of the question.

And...

So it is my contention that a Biblical view of Law does not stop at things "expressly forbidden"-- it also extends to certain neccessary implications, as the body of Dueteronomical case Law illustrates.

If laws can be enacted from those necessary implications, yet are considered to be provisional enactments, then is it really a law in terms of its transcendence? The problem I find (and I think you, myself and the other ex-Renewal leaders have talked about this) is that laws like these don't expire after the circumstances are gone. Also, does such a scenario make this biblical situational ethics?

6:02 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home